Blog

  • Positive results of US visit to be visible ‘very soon’: Interior Minister Naqvi – Pakistan

    Positive results of US visit to be visible ‘very soon’: Interior Minister Naqvi – Pakistan


    Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi said on Saturday that positive results of his visit to the United States during President Donald Trump’s inauguration would be witnessed very soon.

    Pakistan views its ties with the US as vital, with hopes of navigating shared interests in a region marked by evolving dynamics and competing priorities. The government, therefore, made an early effort to engage with the Trump administration by quietly dispatching Naqvi as a special envoy to meet members of the administration’s foreign policy team and Congressional leaders.

    Naqvi reportedly made a diplomatic misstep by attending an event hosted by the New Federal State of China, the US-based political lobby, composed of Chinese dissidents and Americans, that advocates for the overthrow of China’s ruling Communist Party, a major ally of Pakistan.

    Questioned about his visit while speaking to the media in Lahore, Naqvi said: “You will see positive results very soon. Pakistan’s government and the US government have a very good relationship, I went there in the same stead.

    “I met with several senators and congressmen there. Some things are only based on social media demand and some things are based on reality. You have already started seeing some results in reality and some will be happening soon.”

    Questioned about the PTI’s call for a protest in Lahore on February 8 coinciding with the tri-nation ODI series involving Pakistan, New Zealand and South Africa from February 8-14, Naqvi said the PTI would be requested to not do so, saying it had similarly picked dates that matched up with sensitive events in November.

    “If they don’t then …,” the interior minister said as he trailed off with a smile towards reporters with a nod of his head.

    A day of pitched battles between security forces and PTI protesters across the federal capital ended in a hasty retreat of the party’s top leadership and supporters from the Red Zone in the early hours of Nov 27.

    At least six lives were lost in the three days of protests, which included a policeman and three Rangers officials who were knocked down by a speeding vehicle, officials and hospital sources said. Claims and counter-claims over deaths purportedly caused by law-enforcement action against the PTI marchers remain a major bone of contention between the government and the opposition party.

    Earlier this week, an associate of Trump, who was leading a delegation of investors to Pakistan to explore business opportunities, said the US administration had nothing but respect for the incumbent leadership of Pakistan.

    Gentry Beach, who also met PM Shehbaz, made these remarks at a press conference as journalists asked him questions about Richard Grenell — Trump’s special missions envoy in the new administration — who had tweeted in support of incarcerated PTI chief Imran Khan, stirring controversy.

    The US investor said Grenell “may have been misled” about Pakistan. “He personally told me there are a number of deepfakes, AI presentations on the internet … it’s not true or real,” he said in response to a question.

    Beach had said Trump believed in economic diplomacy and that their visit was part of that effort. “We plan on investing billions of dollars in Pakistan across a number of different areas, including critical minerals and real estate […] From a real estate perspective, we brought our real estate development partners, and I am going to build some of the most high-end and luxury properties ever seen in Pakistan,” he had said.

    recent cases of human smuggling, the interior minister responded: “Give us some time, we will be revamping the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) soon on a massive scale.”

    He said that the highest number of people involved in the smuggling cases were from Faisalabad and Gujranwala divisions, saying, “We get happy if a Pakistani goes abroad via the proper channels and not in a manner that gives the country a bad name. Give us some time, you will see much better results.”

    Naqvi was also asked about immigration-related issues at airports and regarding reports that travellers were being asked for bribes to which he responded: “Just wait a little while. You will see a major revamp in the FIA. We have had to take strict measures at immigration but I don’t want people who are going rightfully to face issues.”



    Source link

  • KPMG announces resignation of Mahama’s Acting Commissioner-General of GRA Kwasi Sarpong

    KPMG announces resignation of Mahama’s Acting Commissioner-General of GRA Kwasi Sarpong


    Acting Commissioner-General of the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) Anthony Kwasi Sarpong Acting Commissioner-General of the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) Anthony Kwasi Sarpong

    Auditing firm KPMG Ghana has announced the resignation of its Country Managing Partner, Anthony Kwasi Sarpong, following his appointment by President John Dramani Mahama as the Acting Commissioner-General of the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA).

    This was contained in a statement issued by the firm on January 31, 2025 via Facebook.

    His appointment sparked initial controversy. Leading to a private citizen, Emmanuella Sarfowaah, filing a suit at the High Court challenging the President’s decision.

    She argues that Sarpong still holds an interest in KPMG, where he is listed as a senior partner, raising concerns about a potential conflict of interest.

    Additionally, she contends that the appointment of a Commissioner-General in the absence of a Governing Council is unlawful.

    In a development that weakens the legal challenge, KPMG Ghana, in a statement issued on Friday, January 31, 2025, formally announced Sarpong’s departure from the firm.

    The statement highlighted his 29 years of service in various leadership roles, expressing gratitude for his dedication, innovation, and significant contributions to the firm’s growth.

    The firm further reaffirmed its commitment to upholding the highest standards of service and professionalism, assuring clients, stakeholders, and the public that Sarpong’s exit would not affect its operations.

    “As Tony transitions from the firm, we want to assure our clients and stakeholders that KPMG remains steadfast in its commitment to delivering exceptional service and support,” the statement read.

    KPMG also acknowledged Sarpong’s instrumental role in shaping the organisation’s reputation and success, while expressing confidence in the strength, talent, and resilience of its team to build upon the firm’s solid foundation and achieve even greater success in the future.

    See the statement below:

    About Anthony Kwasi Sarpong’s appointment:

    Anthony Kwasi Sarpong was appointed the Acting Commissioner-General of the Ghana Revenue Authority following the resignation of the former Commissioner-General, Julie Essiam, on January 20, 2025.

    The appointment letter stated, “His Excellency John Dramani Mahama, President of the Republic of Ghana, in accordance with Article 195(1) of the Constitution and Section 13(1) of the Ghana Revenue Act, 2009 (Act 791), has appointed you as the Acting Commissioner-General of the Ghana Revenue Authority, pending receipt of the constitutionally required advice of the Governing Board, given in consultation with the Public Services Commission.”

    Signed by the Secretary to the President, Callistus Mahama, the letter noted that the appointment took effect from January 21, 2025.

    MA



    Source link

  • Live updates: Trump tariff news, executive actions and latest remarks on DC plane crash

    Live updates: Trump tariff news, executive actions and latest remarks on DC plane crash


    The Trump administration is preparing to revoke legal status for many migrants who entered the United States under a Biden-era program, according to a source familiar with the planning, expanding the pool of people who could be deported.

    The move is expected to impact migrants from Nicaragua, Cuba, Venezuela and Haiti who arrived under President Joe Biden as part of a humanitarian parole program and were allowed to temporarily live and work in the US. More than 530,000 people from those countries arrived to the US under the program.

    Some are eligible for other programs that could protect them from deportation. But if they have not pursued other legal avenues to remain in the US, they may be eligible for removal, according to the source.

    Many of those who arrived under the humanitarian parole program have been in the US for less than two years. Trump officials have expanded a procedure to speed up deportations, to include undocumented immigrants anywhere in the US who cannot prove they’ve lived in the US continuously for two years or more.

    Some background: This is the latest in a series of moves by the Trump administration to strip temporary protections for migrants already residing in the United States.

    Republicans slammed Biden’s use of the humanitarian parole program, arguing that his administration exceeded its authority in its use of the program. In his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order calling for a review of parole.

    Biden administration officials argued the so-called humanitarian parole authority helped drive down illegal border crossings by giving people a legal pathway to the country. The program required that migrants have a sponsor in the US, undergo screening and vetting, and complete vaccinations.

    The proposal, first reported by CBS News, is still being finalized.



    Source link

  • Parliament suspends official over unauthorized payments

    Parliament suspends official over unauthorized payments


    A Transitional National Legislative Assembly (TNLA) official has been suspended for three months over unauthorized payment adjustments, according to a document seen by Radio Tamazuj.

    John Onorio, the Controller of TNLA, was found to have increased staff allowances to $100 per person instead of the approved $50, an action deemed a serious breach of financial regulations and administrative policies.

    In a letter dated January 31, 2025, TNLA Clerk Kaku Ngong, stated that Onorio’s response to an earlier inquiry was unsatisfactory. Consequently, he has been suspended from February 1 to April 30, 2025 and is required to hand over all official documents, records, and assets under his responsibility before the close of business on January 31, 2025.

    “Given the gravity of this matter and in line with TNLA administrative directives, you are hereby suspended from duty for a period of three (3) months,” the letter reads.

    During the suspension, Onorio is barred from engaging in any official duties or accessing TNLA premises unless explicitly authorized.

    Additionally, an internal review is ongoing to assess the full impact of the financial irregularity, and further disciplinary action may be considered.

    The suspension raises concerns about financial transparency within parliament as South Sudan grapples with broader governance and accountability challenges.

    There has been no official comment from Onorio regarding the suspension. The TNLA leadership, including the Speaker and Deputy Speaker, who were copied in the letter, have yet to make a public statement.

    Observers note that this case could lead to stricter financial oversight within TNLA, prompting wider investigations into the legislative body’s management.

    More details are expected regarding the extent of the financial breach and whether other officials were involved.



    Source link

  • ‘No apology for state land allegations against Akufo-Addo’s children’

    ‘No apology for state land allegations against Akufo-Addo’s children’


    Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, Minister of Foreign Affairs designate Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, Minister of Foreign Affairs designate

    Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, during his vetting for the position of Foreign Minister, was asked to address allegations he made in December 2024 regarding the acquisition of state lands by the children of President Nana Akufo-Addo.

    The Lands Commission’s response, which Ablakwa had previously cited, indicated that the lands were not state-owned but were part of an estate held by the late Justice Johnson S.A.

    In response, Ablakwa explained, “When I put out that article, I supported it with evidence from the Lands Commission. I conducted an official search and published the results.

    “The Lands Commission confirmed in their response that these lands were government lands.”

    He continued, “I was merely asking a question based on the official search results. My inquiry was: Is this another instance of state capture?”

    He further argued, “There is no need for me to apologize. The focus should be on reforming the Lands Commission to prevent future inaccuracies in the data they provide.

    “If you believe the Lands Commission misled me, then we should work together to ensure their data is accurate.”

    Ablakwa concluded by reiterating his point, “We need to address the system that led to the misinformation and ensure that the public gets accurate records from the Lands Commission.”



    Source link

  • Hoardings vs Social Media: Congress’ Outdated Approach

    Hoardings vs Social Media: Congress’ Outdated Approach


    Hoardings vs Social Media: Congress' Outdated Approach

    The Telangana Congress party seems to be working with outdated formulae, not pacing up with the modern day requirements. 

    While the state government recently erected large hoardings across Hyderabad roads celebrating Rs 1.78 lakh crore worth of investments brought in from the Davos World Economic Summit, the irony is hard to ignore; who is actually seeing these hoardings on the roads?

    In today’s world, it’s social media that should be utilized to reach the masses, but Congress seems to be lagging behind in adapting to modern communication strategies.

    Adding to the chaos, the party has once again demonstrated its internal disarray.

    Duddilla Sreedhar, a minister in the Congress government, praised Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu in the matter of bringing in investments, rather than Telangana’s own CM, Revanth Reddy.

    This public display of favoritism has only added to the perception of a party lacking in hierarchical discipline. 

    In Congress, it often feels like no leader is genuinely supportive of the growth of another, particularly when it comes to the position of Chief Minister. 

    The latest embarrassment came when Congress decided to conduct a Twitter poll asking people to choose between “Farmhouse Party” (a term coined by Congress for BRS) and “Public Governance” (a name the Congress gave itself).

    The results were a disaster for the party—67% of respondents voted against Congress, further highlighting its weak social media presence and the misguided actions of some leaders. 

    With such disarray and lack of coherent strategy, Revanth Reddy’s position and credibility were publicly undermined, leaving the party in an embarrassing situation on a national level.

    Jagan Mohan Reddy, despite having strong social media support during his tenure, primarily used it to target TDP leaders rather than highlight his achievements in attracting investments and signing MOUs. In the end, this approach didn’t work out for him.

    Now, Revanth Reddy seems to be heading down the same path by not fully utilizing social media to his advantage.





    Source link

  • Federal employees confused, angered by Trump’s offer to quit

    Federal employees confused, angered by Trump’s offer to quit




    CNN
     — 

    President Donald Trump’s offer to most federal employees to resign now and be paid through September stunned the workers who received it – angering some, confusing many and raising questions about whether the offer is even legal.

    When a US Department of Agriculture staffer based in Mississippi received the deferred resignation offer on Tuesday, they read through it, laughing because it was just “nonsensical,” and then deleted it.

    “I’ve got my whole entire life invested in the federal government,” said the staffer, who also spent time in the military. “I’m not going to throw everything away.”

    Across the United States, multiple federal workers who spoke with CNN said they weren’t willing to sacrifice benefits beyond their salaries – including health and retirement benefits and student loan forgiveness – not to mention careers. They requested their names not be used for fear of retaliation.

    Federal workers’ unions quickly lashed out at the deferred resignation offer, stressing that it was not a buyout and that the administration might not be able to follow through on it.

    “Employees should not take the Program at face value,” the American Federation of Government Employees, the largest federal workforce union, told members about the offer in an FAQ on Wednesday. The communications from the Office of Personnel Management are “riddled with inconsistencies and uncertainties. It is also unclear whether OPM has the legal authority to support the Program or its alleged benefits, and the eligibility criteria are vague.”

    The union warned that the offer contains no guarantees that employees whose resignations are accepted “will receive the benefits that the Program purports to offer.” And it noted that the federal government is only funded through mid-March, so the Trump administration cannot make payment promises beyond then until Congress passes a spending bill.

    The backlash prompted the Trump administration to send another email to employees on Friday, this time coming from their individual agencies. It reinforced, in underlined text, that the offer is “valid, lawful, and will be honored by” the respective departments. Also, those who accept the offer will “not be subject to a reduction-in-force or other premature separation,” will not be expected to work during the roughly eight-month period (with rare exceptions) and can take a non-governmental job during that time.

    Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller said, without evidence, that “a significant number of federal workers have accepted the buyout offer” during a gaggle with reporters at the White House Friday.

    But workers CNN interviewed are not jumping at the chance to jump ship.

    The Mississippi USDA employee, who said accepting the offer is out of the question, was most offended that the OPM email referenced that federal employees should be “loyal.”

    “When I raised my right hand way back a long time ago, I swore to defend the Constitution,” they told CNN. “So I’m not loyal to anybody. I’m loyal to my country.”

    The OPM email, which contained the subject line “Fork in the Road,” had many similarities to an email that X, then called Twitter, sent to its employees days after Elon Musk took over the company. Musk now leads Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency, which has been tasked with shrinking the federal workforce as one of its mandates.

    The offer came as Trump seeks to reshape the federal workforce – including reducing its size, replacing career workers with political appointees, wiping away some civil service protections, ending diversity efforts and more.

    Some 2.4 million people work for the federal government, not including postal workers, who are not eligible for the package. Also excluded are military personnel and those in positions related to immigration enforcement and national security, among others.

    Those who qualify have to decide by February 6.

    A US Department of Agriculture employee, who is nearing retirement, said they won’t take Trump up on the incentive and don’t expect anyone else in their field office in Illinois to, either.

    “They’re trying to change everything overnight,” said the employee. “They’re trying to reinvent the government, and I don’t think they can do it.”

    “I retire by 60. I have my 25 years. I’m vested. I’m not going anywhere,” they continued.

    Trump’s administration is also seeking to crack down on federal employees working from home or in hybrid roles, rather than in their offices full-time.

    But much of the federal workforce is located outside the nation’s capital, and Trump’s offer was met with confusion and skepticism in many of those offices. While some workers said it was unclear from the original email if they’d have to continue working through September, an FAQ on the OPM site said that employees would not be expected to work and were encouraged to find private sector jobs.

    “You are most welcome (to) stay at home and relax or to travel to your dream destination. Whatever you would like,” the FAQ read.

    Others didn’t like the ominous warning in the OPM email that if they opt to stay, “we cannot give you full assurance regarding the certainty of your position or agency.” They also bristled at the OPM FAQ that encourages workers to move from “lower productivity jobs in the public sector to higher productivity jobs in the private sector” to boost American prosperity.

    A Labor Department employee told CNN they initially considered the offer, but said, “as time passes, more skepticism grows,” in part because of their doubts that the Trump administration will follow through on the eight months of pay it offered.

    One Department of Veterans Affairs worker said the Trump administration’s offer had backfired.

    “Before today, I heard nothing except folks wanting to leave,” the worker said a day after receiving the offer. “Today folks are determined to stay.”

    The initial offer to quit raised eyebrows among some who said the emails they’ve received lately from the OPM did not look legitimate. Some thought the initial test emails OPM sent last week were phishing scams, prompting them to ask their managers what to do.

    Some federal workers said Trump’s changes will uproot their lives – and said the offer diminishes the value of work they believe helps Americans.

    One Internal Revenue Service worker told CNN that the offer angered them, although a few of their colleagues have expressed interest in it.

    “Do they think we’re stupid enough to do it?” said the staffer, who intends to stay with the federal government until retirement, which is still years away. “They are going to have to fire me.”

    The worker, who lives in the South with their spouse and young child, said they find it fulfilling to help people.

    “I really do love it, especially when I’m on the phone with someone getting their problems sorted out and [the taxpayer is] having money coming their way that they’ve been desperately trying to get ahold of on their own,” the IRS staffer said.

    Some workers found the OPM email disturbing. One Department of Interior employee – who said their division is already understaffed and has had to hire contractors, who are paid more – couldn’t sleep on Tuesday night after receiving the deferred resignation package.

    “It’s intimidation. It’s harassment,” said the worker, who lives in Oklahoma. “It’s questioning all the hard work and importance of what we do. Being treated like this is not humane, and it’s not professional.”

    The OPM email was written in a manner designed to coerce federal employees to resign, Doreen Greenwald, national president of the National Treasury Employees Union, told CNN in an interview.

    “It was written in a very negative tone, in a threatening manner,” she said. “It provided no clarity on what was being offered.”

    After OPM announced the offer, the union sent an urgent notice to members “strongly” urging them not to resign. The NTEU wanted to reassure employees that they had a choice, Greenwald said.

    “There were no answers provided in that document, and so we had to provide that information to our members to protect them,” she told CNN.

    Plus, having a mass exodus of federal employees “would be catastrophic to the federal government and the services that Americans depend on every day,” Greenwald said.

    Other federal employee unions had similar messages for their members, all questioning the legality of the offer.

    “Unlike structured programs that the federal government offered in the past to decrease the number of federal employees, this maneuver is intended to panic civil servants into accepting what seems like a sweet deal but is probably a scam,” Randy Erwin, national president of the National Federation of Federal Employees, said in a statement Wednesday.

    “The offer is a scare tactic designed to pressure federal workers into quitting while promising under an illegal and unenforceable agreement to pay them until October.”



    Source link